André Kertész (American, born Hungary, 1894–1985) [A Corner of Mondrian’s Studio], 1926
from: theshipthatflew

André Kertész (American, born Hungary, 1894–1985) [A Corner of Mondrian’s Studio], 1926

from: theshipthatflew

>

The modern hero...

“The modern hero, the modern individual who dares to heed the call and seek the mansion of that presence with whom it is our whole destiny to be atoned, cannot, indeed must not, wait for his community to cast off its slough of pride, fear, rationalized avarice, and sanctified misunderstanding. “Live,” Nietzsche says, “as though the day were here.” It is not society that is to guide and save the creative hero, but precisely the reverse. And so every one of us shares the supreme ordeal—carries the cross of the redeemer—not in the bright moments of his tribe’s great victories, but in the silences of his personal despair.”

~Joseph Campbell, “The Hero with a Thousand Faces” (last paragraph)

Thank you Uncertain Times

Do not fear mistakes. There are none.
Miles Davis (via santosha65, bitchville)
F. Bedrich Grünzweig, “Camden, Maine,” Silver print (from: yama-bato)

F. Bedrich Grünzweig, “Camden, Maine,” Silver print (from: yama-bato)

Zen practice in the midst of activity
is superior to that pursued within tranquility.
Hakuin (1686–1769) (via sharanam)
…fundamentalism is not the only religious response to the modernist critique of religion. An alternative response accepts the constructive criticisms of the agnostics, skeptics, and humanists, and admits that religion in the past has been deeply flawed. But rather than reject religion, it seeks a new understanding of what it means to be religious. Those who take this route, the liberal religious wing, come to understand religion as primarily a way to find a proper orientation in life, as a guide in our struggles with the crises, conflicts, and insecurities that haunt our lives, including our awareness of our inevitable mortality. We undertake the religious quest, not to pass from this world to a transcendent realm beyond, but to discover a transcendent dimension of life-—a superior light, a platform of ultimate meaning—-amidst the turmoil of everyday existence.
>

Rethinking Buddhism from the ground up

Question: What then, did you conclude were distinctly Buddhist ideas?

Answer: Four things stand out.

  1. One is the principle of dependent origination, or “conditioned arising” as I call it;
  2. the second is the practice of mindful awareness—being focused upon the totality of what is happening in our moment-to-moment experience;
  3. the third is the process of the Four Noble Truths, which includes the Eightfold Path; and
  4. fourth, the principle of self-reliance—how the Buddha really wanted his students to become autonomous in their understanding of the dharma, and not to generate dependencies upon either the memory of him or upon some authority figure within the monastic community.

By getting down to the bare bones of what the Buddha was teaching, one is then perhaps in a position to begin to rethink Buddhism from the ground up. And I feel the four points that I listed are entirely adequate for constructing a new vision of the dharma, both as a worldview and as a form of spiritual and ethical practice, which speaks to our condition here and now.

From an interview with Stephen Batchelor, author of Buddhism without Beliefs and the recently published Confessions of a Buddhist Atheist in the Spring 2010 issue of Tricycle: The Buddhist Review.

Meditation, simply defined, is a way of being aware. It is the happy marriage of doing and being. It lifts the fog of our ordinary lives to reveal what is hidden; it loosens the knot of self-centeredness and opens the heart; it moves us beyond mere concepts to allow for a direct experience of reality. Meditation embodies the way of awakening: both the path and its fruition. From one point of view, it is the means to awakening; from another, it is awakening itself.
Lama Surya Das, from “The Heart Essence of Buddhist Meditation” via Tricycle Daily Dharma (via sharanam) (via fuckyeahzenmind)

Whether we write or speak or do but look
We are ever unapparent. What we are
Cannot be transfused into word or book.
Our soul from us is infinitely far.
However much we give our thoughts the will
To be our souls and gesture it abroad,
Our hearts are incommunicable still.
In what we show ourselves we are ignored.
The abyss from soul to soul cannot be bridged
By any skill of thought or trick of seeming.
Unto our very selves we are abridged
When we would utter to our thoughts our being.
       We are our dreams of ourselves, souls by gleams,
       And each to each other dreams of others’ dreams.

Fernando Pessoa
(english sonnets)

from: unlitstairs & dataobscura

Robert Doisneau, “Information,” 1956 from “Three Seconds of Eternity”
Thank you, kvetchlandia, migue-e & liquidnight

Robert Doisneau, “Information,” 1956 from “Three Seconds of Eternity”

Thank you, kvetchlandia, migue-e & liquidnight